Vollständiger Abstract
Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?
ABSTRACT An important aspect of the performance of algorithms that predict individualized treatment effects (ITEs) is moderate calibration, that is, the average treatment effect among individuals with predicted treatment effect of z being equal to z. The assessment of moderate calibration is a challenging task on two fronts: counterfactual responses are unobserved, and quantifying the conditional response function for models that generate continuous predicted values requires regularization. Perhaps because of these challenges, there is currently no inferential method for the null hypothesis that an ITE model is moderately calibrated in a population. In this work, we propose nonparametric methods for the assessment of moderate calibration of ITE models for binary outcomes using data from a randomized trial. These methods simultaneously resolve both challenges, resulting in novel graphical, numerical, and inferential methods for the assessment of moderate calibration. The key idea is to formulate a stochastic process for the cumulative prediction errors that obeys a functional central limit theorem, enabling the use of the properties of Brownian motion for asymptotic inference. We propose two approaches to construct this process from a sample: a conditional approach that relies on predicted risks (often an auxiliary output of ITE models), and a marginal approach based on replacing the cumulative conditional expected value and variance terms with their marginal counterparts. Numerical simulations confirm the desirable properties of both approaches and their ability to detect miscalibration of different forms. We use a case study to provide suggestions on graphical presentation and the interpretation of results. Moderate calibration of predicted ITEs can be assessed without requiring regularization techniques or making assumptions about the functional form of treatment response. The accompanying cumulcalib R package implements this method ( https://cran.r‐project.org/package=cumulcalib ).
Bibliografischer Nachweis
Publikationsdaten
- Autor:innen
- Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Jeroen Hoogland, Thomas P. A. Debray, John Petkau
- Quelle
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publikation
- 2026-01-01
- Band / Ausgabe
- Nicht angegeben
- Seiten
- Nicht angegeben
- ISSN / ISBN
- 0277-6715, 1097-0258
- Zitationen
- 0 laut Crossref
- Referenzen
- 0 hinterlegt
Zitieren
Zitierfähiger Nachweis
Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Jeroen Hoogland, Thomas P. A. Debray, John Petkau (2026). Nonparametric Assessment of the Calibration of Individualized Treatment Effects. Statistics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70724
Kontext