Frag' FlorenceEvidenz. Klar. Anwendbar.
Uhr 7/8Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Clinicians’ Perception and Management of Cancer Patients’ Decision Making Burden

Fiorella L. Huijgens, Inge Henselmans, Mette J. Huisinga, Gwen M. P. Diepenhorst, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven, Anke J. M. Oerlemans, Marij A. Hillen

Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Abstract Background Clinicians in cancer care are increasingly expected to involve patients in treatment decision making. Some patients may feel burdened by such involvement. It is unclear how clinicians recognize and respond to patient burden in shared decision making (SDM). Objective We aimed to gain more insight into experiences of oncology clinicians regarding patients’ burden of involvement in decision making. Design We used semi-structured in-depth qualitative interviews. Participants and Approach Clinicians who discussed curative treatment options with patients who had breast or prostate cancer were purposively sampled and interviewed. Questions addressed how clinicians detected, explained and addressed patient burden. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis Two researchers inductively coded the interviews using thematic analysis. Key Results Clinicians ( N = 20) described several indicators of patient burden, such as the question “What would you do, doctor?”, patients assuming notably active or passive roles in decision making, and stalling or rushing the decision. Clinicians attributed patient burden to uncertainty, unmet expectations, and emotional vulnerability post-diagnosis. They indicated using various strategies to mitigate burden, such as normalizing the difficulty of decision making, or offering time to think. Clinicians varied in their willingness to provide a treatment recommendation. Some offered it to prevent potential burden due to uncertainty or decisional distress, while others refrained from giving explicit advice, believing that SDM entails patients should make their own choice. Conclusion Clinicians’ responses to perceived decision making burden in patients were variable. Discussions about how to navigate tensions between autonomy and avoiding harm could foster greater unity among clinicians on addressing patients’ burden in SDM.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Fiorella L. Huijgens, Inge Henselmans, Mette J. Huisinga, Gwen M. P. Diepenhorst, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven, Anke J. M. Oerlemans, Marij A. Hillen
Quelle
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0884-8734, 1525-1497
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Fiorella L. Huijgens, Inge Henselmans, Mette J. Huisinga, Gwen M. P. Diepenhorst, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven, Anke J. M. Oerlemans, Marij A. Hillen (2026). Clinicians’ Perception and Management of Cancer Patients’ Decision Making Burden. Journal of General Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-026-10737-4
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1