Frag' FlorenceEvidenz. Klar. Anwendbar.
Uhr 7/8Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

10.1016/S0271-7964(08)70698-0

CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · 2000

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

<h4>Aim</h4>To summarize current evidence regarding preferences for self-management behaviours among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with chronic diseases during the healthcare transition period.<h4>Design</h4>Mixed-methods systematic review.<h4>Methods</h4>The review following the Joanna Briggs Institute Mixed Methods Systematic Review (JBI M-MSR) methodology convergent integrated approach, which is separate qualitative and quantitative syntheses followed by integration in a narrative form. The methodological quality of included articles was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.<h4>Data sources</h4>We searched nine databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, psyINFO, CNKI, Wan Fang and SinoMed) from their inception up to December 4, 2025, restricting results to English and Chinese publications.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 31 studies were included in the review. These studies synthesise three main themes: (1) preferences for medical management behaviours; (2) preferences for emotional coping strategies and (3) preferences for role and identity maintenance.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This review underscores the importance of understanding AYAs' preferences for self-management behaviours during healthcare transition, offering insights to improve their engagement and adherence.<h4>Implications for the profession and/or patient care</h4>Healthcare providers can improve transition outcomes for AYAs with chronic diseases by surveying their preferences for self-management behaviours and creating tailored plans.<h4>Impact</h4>Highlights the importance of considering diverse preferences for self-management behaviours. Contributes to improving health outcomes and quality of life for AYAs during healthcare transitions.<h4>Reporting method</h4>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) checklist was followed.<h4>Patient or public contribution</h4>This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nicht angegeben
Quelle
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
Publikation
2000-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0849-6757
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

(2000). 10.1016/S0271-7964(08)70698-0. CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70698
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON