Silent Pain or Silent Records? Pain Visibility, Documentation Ethics, and Nursing Management in Neurocritical Care

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

ABSTRACT Pain assessment in critical care is organised primarily around patient self‐report and numerical scoring, an arrangement that protects the patient's first‐person authority. In neurocritical care, however, critically ill patients with stroke may be unable to communicate because of aphasia, impaired consciousness, sedation, mechanical ventilation, or delirium. Under these conditions, the absence of a numerical score may reflect limitations in the systems through which pain is made visible rather than the absence of pain. This paper offers an empirically informed philosophical analysis of what a missing numerical pain score means in neurocritical care and asks how nursing can preserve clinically and ethically meaningful distinctions when a number cannot be responsibly produced. As an empirical point of departure, an extracted adult ischaemic‐stroke ICU‐stay dataset from MIMIC‐IV (6054 ICU stays, 5065 patients) was used, focusing on the first pain score, defined as the earliest documented numerical pain score within the first 24 h after ICU admission among patients with stroke. The empirical material is treated not as epidemiological evidence but as an occasion for conceptual analysis. Of 6054 ICU stays, 2415 (39.9%) had no documented first pain score in the first‐24‐h structured field. This pattern is not interpreted as evidence that pain was absent, unassessed, or unrecognised in any individual case. Drawing on this finding, the paper develops a five‐fold conceptual taxonomy of missingness: absence of pain, absence of self‐report, absence of assessment, absence of documentation, and risk of non‐recognition. Nursing management is presented as a moral‐epistemic practice in which electronic record categories, quality indicators, staffing, education, and workflow shape whether possible pain becomes visible, documentable, auditable, and answerable. The central task is not to force every patient into a number, but to preserve clinically and ethically meaningful differences when a number cannot be responsibly produced.