Risk-Guided Screening for Atrial Fibrillation Using Electronic Health Records

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

BACKGROUND: Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) on the basis of AF risk may be more effective. We aimed to develop, externally validate, and prospectively test a machine learning prediction model using electronic health records (EHRs) to guide AF screening. METHODS: We developed and validated a random forest prediction model for new AF within 6 months, using age, sex, and 10 comorbidities (Future Innovations in Novel Detection of Atrial Fibrillation [FIND-AF] 2.0) in EHRs in the United Kingdom (n=2 081 139), Japan (n=7 795 244), Israel (n=2 166 795), Canada (n=627 919), and China (n=149 145). We conducted a prospective study where participants ≥30 years old without AF and with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥2 in men and ≥3 in women, stratified by FIND-AF 2.0 into high and low risk, undertook 4 ECG recordings per day for 3 weeks using a handheld ECG recorder, with a primary outcome of newly diagnosed AF. We estimated stroke risk associated with nonanticoagulated AF in patients with high FIND-AF 2.0 risk in the FinACAF (Finnish Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation) registry of patients with AF (n=229 565). RESULTS: FIND-AF 2.0 was applicable to all EHRs and showed good to excellent prediction performance (United Kingdom: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.819 [95% CI, 0.809–0.829]; Israel: AUROC, 0.835 [95% CI, 0.828–0.842]; Japan: AUROC, 0.751 [95% CI, 0.745–0.757]; Canada: AUROC, 0.747 [95% CI, 0.741–0.753]; China: AUROC, 0.753 [95% CI, 0.725–0.771]), with AUROC>0.7 in men and women in all cohorts, and improved performance compared with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and C 2 HEST (coronary artery disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [1 point each]; hypertension [1 point]; elderly [age ≥75 years, 2 points]; systolic HF [2 points]; thyroid disease [hyperthyroidism, 1 point]). Of 1923 participants from 15 sites in the prospective study (mean age, 70.2 [SD 9.4] years), with a mean of 74.8 (SD, 19.4) ECG recordings, AF was diagnosed in 5 of 902 (0.6%) with low FIND-AF 2.0 risk and 46 of 1021 (4.5%) with high FIND-AF 2.0 risk (odds ratio, 8.46 [95% CI, 3.35–21.40], P