Vollständiger Abstract
Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?
ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence and longitudinal course of post-stroke fatigue and identify subgroups with distinct fatigue trajectories up to 5 years post-stroke.DesignA prospective, longitudinal, multi-centre cohort study.SettingHospital stroke units in the Central-Norway health region.ParticipantsIncident ischaemic stroke patients were recruited during acute hospitalisation between June 2015 and November 2017. Data were collected during the hospital stay and at 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years.Main measuresFatigue was assessed using the 7-item Fatigue Severity Scale with <u>></u>5 as cut-off to define clinical fatigue.ResultsA total of 693 participants were included. The prevalence of clinical fatigue was 24% (3 months), 28% (1 year), 30% (3 years), and 28% (5 years). A Sankey diagram illustrated substantial variability in fatigue status across time points. Using group-based trajectory modelling, four latent subgroups with distinct fatigue trajectories were identified: (1) low fatigue, (2) emerging fatigue, (3) improving fatigue, and (4) high fatigue.ConclusionOne quarter to one third of the study population consistently exhibited fatigue up to 5 years post-stroke. High variability in fatigue status over time was evident, indicating individual-level heterogeneity in the longitudinal course. This was further confirmed by the identification of four latent subgroups with distinct post-stroke fatigue trajectories. Early detection of individuals at risk of an adverse fatigue trajectory and differentiated follow-up may improve outcomes for stroke survivors.
Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz
Bibliografischer Nachweis
Publikationsdaten
- Autor:innen
- Nicht angegeben
- Quelle
- CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
- Publikation
- 2015-01-01
- Band / Ausgabe
- Nicht angegeben
- Seiten
- Nicht angegeben
- ISSN / ISBN
- 0849-6757
- Zitationen
- 0 laut Crossref
- Referenzen
- 0 hinterlegt
Zitieren
Zitierfähiger Nachweis
(2015). 10.1177/1056789514562152. CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155261476638