Frag' FlorenceEvidenz. Klar. Anwendbar.
Uhr 7/8Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Crossref · journal-article

Three versus seven days of apramycin treatment for post-weaning diarrhoea in piglets: clinical and resistance gene outcomes from a cluster-randomised field trial

Emma Smedsgaard Byskov, Laura Goncalves Pereira, Mattia Pirolo, Ken Steen Pedersen, John Elmerdahl Olsen, Luca Guardabassi, Peter Damborg

Porcine Health Management · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Abstract Background Post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD) is a major driver of antimicrobial use in pigs. Optimising treatment duration may reduce selection pressure while maintaining clinical efficacy, but under EU Regulation (EU) 2019/6 veterinarians must adhere to authorised treatment durations, creating a need for evidence to support label changes. This study aimed to determine whether a 3-day apramycin treatment is non-inferior to the standard 7-day course for clinical cure of PWD and to assess its effect on the abundance of the apramycin resistance gene aac(3)-IV . Methods A cluster-randomised non-inferiority field trial was conducted in 518 diarrhoeic piglets across 28 pens in a commercial herd. Piglets received apramycin for 3 or 7 days. Clinical cure was assessed by faecal scoring at end of treatment (EOT) and at a common Day 8 timepoint after treatment initiation. A non-inferiority margin of − 10% points was applied. Pen-level aac(3)-IV/ 16S abundance was quantified by qPCR. Results Non-inferiority of the 3-day course was not demonstrated at EOT (184/257 [71.6%] vs. 204/261 [78.2%]; risk difference − 0.063, 95% CI − 0.184 to 0.058), but was demonstrated at the common Day 8 timepoint (215/257 [83.7%] vs. 204/261 [78.2%]; risk difference + 0.055, 95% CI − 0.076 to 0.184). At EOT, both groups showed significant reductions in pen-level log10( aac(3)-IV /16S) from baseline, with a greater median decline in the 3-day group than in the 7-day group (− 2.99 vs. − 1.71; p = 0.0258). At Day 8, baseline-adjusted change in relative aac(3)-IV abundance did not differ significantly between groups (− 1.24 vs. − 1.70; p = 0.696). Relative gene abundance was not associated with clinical cure. Conclusions A 3-day apramycin course did not meet the predefined non-inferiority criterion at end of treatment, where the two groups were assessed at different stages of recovery. However, when evaluated at the common Day 8 timepoint, the 3-day course achieved clinical outcomes comparable to the 7-day course, with no evidence of increased resistance gene abundance. These findings support the possibility of shortened treatment duration as a pragmatic antimicrobial stewardship strategy in porcine PWD and as a potential means to reduce antimicrobial consumption in livestock production.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Emma Smedsgaard Byskov, Laura Goncalves Pereira, Mattia Pirolo, Ken Steen Pedersen, John Elmerdahl Olsen, Luca Guardabassi, Peter Damborg
Quelle
Porcine Health Management
Publikation
2026-08-18
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2055-5660
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Emma Smedsgaard Byskov, Laura Goncalves Pereira, Mattia Pirolo, Ken Steen Pedersen, John Elmerdahl Olsen, Luca Guardabassi, Peter Damborg (2026). Three versus seven days of apramycin treatment for post-weaning diarrhoea in piglets: clinical and resistance gene outcomes from a cluster-randomised field trial. Porcine Health Management. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-026-00534-0
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Förderung: Copenhagen University

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1