Frag' FlorenceEvidenz. Klar. Anwendbar.
Uhr 7/8Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Crossref · journal-article

Reliability and validity of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system® (PROMIS®) measures of pain in adult males with hemophilia

Tyler W. Buckner, Dianne Thornhill, Bryce B. Reeve, Thomas A. Wilkinson, Sonia Nasr, Marilyn J. Manco-Johnson

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Abstract Background Inadequate pain assessment in persons with hemophilia (PwH) can lead to undertreatment of hemophilia-related pain. Effective pain management in PwH is limited by the lack of valid, reliable pain assessment tools that can be readily incorporated into clinical practice. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System ® (PROMIS ® ) pain intensity, interference, and behavior measures in PwH. Methods PROMIS pain measures were evaluated in a cross-sectional study that consecutively enrolled males ages ≥ 18 years with hemophilia A or B during routine clinical visits. Participants provided responses to static short forms (for the pain intensity domain) or to computerized adaptive tests (for pain interference and pain behavior domains) using electronic devices. Content validity was assessed through one-on-one interviews. Reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability), known group validity, and convergent validity were also evaluated. Results Responses to PROMIS pain measures were collected from 150 participants. Content validity for the PROMIS pain interference item bank was good, with no coverage gaps identified in eight one-on-one interviews. Internal consistency for PROMIS pain measures was high (marginal reliability ranging between 0.87 and 0.91), and PROMIS pain measures showed adequate test/retest reliability over 24–72 h (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.85–0.95). We observed strong to very strong correlations between PROMIS measures and Brief Pain Inventory and Short Form-36 pain subscales (Pearson correlation coefficient magnitudes of 0.66–0.88), indicating convergent validity for these measurements. Conclusions Results from this cross-sectional study support the reliability and validity of PROMIS pain intensity, interference, and behavior measures when assessing patient-reported pain in male PwH.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Tyler W. Buckner, Dianne Thornhill, Bryce B. Reeve, Thomas A. Wilkinson, Sonia Nasr, Marilyn J. Manco-Johnson
Quelle
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Publikation
2026-08-19
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2509-8020
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Tyler W. Buckner, Dianne Thornhill, Bryce B. Reeve, Thomas A. Wilkinson, Sonia Nasr, Marilyn J. Manco-Johnson (2026). Reliability and validity of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system® (PROMIS®) measures of pain in adult males with hemophilia. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-026-01176-0
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1