Vollständiger Abstract
Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?
Background: Inguinal hernia repair is a globally frequent surgical procedure. The Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty is highly effective, yet the optimal suture material non-absorbable versus delayed absorbable for mesh fixation remains debated regarding its impact on postoperative pain and complications. Methods: A prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted on 200 adult patients with primary inguinal hernias. Patients were randomized to undergo open Lichtenstein hernioplasty using either 2-0 polypropylene (non-absorbable, n=100) or 2-0 polyglactin (delayed absorbable, n=100) sutures. Postoperative pain (visual analog scale), recurrence rates, hospital stay, and complications were evaluated over a 6-month follow-up. Results: Postoperative pain scores showed no statistically significant difference between the polypropylene and polyglactin groups at any time point up to 6 months. The incidence of complications, including wound infection, local swelling, seroma, and recurrence, was comparable across both groups. Duration of hospital stay was also similar. Conclusion: Delayed absorbable polyglactin sutures provide a safe and effective alternative to non-absorbable polypropylene sutures for mesh fixation in open Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty, offering comparable short-term outcomes in pain and complication rates.
Bibliografischer Nachweis
Publikationsdaten
- Autor:innen
- Divya Jyoti Banerjee, Zil Desai, Debabrata Maity
- Quelle
- International Surgery Journal
- Publikation
- 2026-01-01
- Band / Ausgabe
- Nicht angegeben
- Seiten
- Nicht angegeben
- ISSN / ISBN
- 2349-2902, 2349-3305
- Zitationen
- 0 laut Crossref
- Referenzen
- 0 hinterlegt
Zitieren
Zitierfähiger Nachweis
Divya Jyoti Banerjee, Zil Desai, Debabrata Maity (2026). Randomised controlled trial of mesh fixation with nonabsorbable versus delayed absorbable suture in open inguinal hernia patients undergoing open inguinal hernioplasty in tertiary health center of Ahmedabad. International Surgery Journal. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20262990