Frag' FlorenceEvidenz. Klar. Anwendbar.
Uhr 7/8Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Machine Learning–Based First-Trimester Antenatal Risk Prediction for Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: Multicenter Model Development Study

Sarah Li, David Y Y Tan, Jingxian Zhang, Aniza P Mahyuddin, Harshaana Ramlal, Sebastian E Illanes, Max Monckeberg, Alejandra F Plaza, Maria L Paz Morgan, Matthew W Kemp, Kee Yuan Ngiam, Peter Lindgren, Marius Kublickas, Karolina Kublickiene, Ruifen Weng, Sidney Yee, Mahesh Choolani

Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Abstract Background Maternal outcomes remain inequitable worldwide. Severe morbidity persists, and current risk assessment tools are largely arbitrary, focusing on biomedical factors while overlooking social determinants of health. There is a need for data-driven AI models to improve early pregnancy risk identification and management. Objective The study aimed to develop and internally validate first-trimester AI-based antenatal risk assessment models across three geographically and socioethnically diverse populations (Sweden, Chile, and Singapore) and to compare their performance with existing clinical risk assessment strategies. Methods We conducted a retrospective population-based study using routinely collected first-trimester data from over 700,000 pregnancies from Sweden, Chile, and Singapore. Separate machine learning models predicting a composite of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were trained and internally validated for each population. Input variables were limited to information available at or before 14 weeks’ gestation. Model discrimination, measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, was compared with corresponding proxies for real-world first-trimester risk assessment approaches in each setting. Model interpretability was assessed using Shapley additive explanations. Results The prevalence of the composite adverse outcome was 10.40% (75,647/727,354) in Sweden, 21.94% (1302/5934) in Chile, and 16.25% (6145/37,813) in Singapore. In Sweden, the guideline-based risk assessment achieved an AUROC of 0.53, compared with 0.65 for the LightGBM (light gradient boosting machine) model ( P

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Sarah Li, David Y Y Tan, Jingxian Zhang, Aniza P Mahyuddin, Harshaana Ramlal, Sebastian E Illanes, Max Monckeberg, Alejandra F Plaza, Maria L Paz Morgan, Matthew W Kemp, Kee Yuan Ngiam, Peter Lindgren, Marius Kublickas, Karolina Kublickiene, Ruifen Weng, Sidney Yee, Mahesh Choolani
Quelle
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
1438-8871
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Sarah Li, David Y Y Tan, Jingxian Zhang, Aniza P Mahyuddin, Harshaana Ramlal, Sebastian E Illanes, Max Monckeberg, Alejandra F Plaza, Maria L Paz Morgan, Matthew W Kemp, Kee Yuan Ngiam, Peter Lindgren, Marius Kublickas, Karolina Kublickiene, Ruifen Weng, Sidney Yee, Mahesh Choolani (2026). Machine Learning–Based First-Trimester Antenatal Risk Prediction for Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: Multicenter Model Development Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/88450
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON