Frag' FlorenceEvidenz. Klar. Anwendbar.
Uhr 7/8Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Assessing Clinical Effectiveness of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam in Bacteremia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Shahd Mohammad, Mosab Albalas, Mohammad M. Al-Ahmad

Antibiotics · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Background/Objectives: Bacteremia poses a significant clinical challenge, often necessitating the off-label use of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations such as Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T), Ceftazidime/Avibactam (C/A), and Meropenem/Vaborbactam (M/V). Despite their widespread use, no conclusive data support their effectiveness in bacteremia. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of C/T, C/A, and M/V in treating bacteremia, with a focus on survival outcomes and clinical cure rates. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following a comprehensive search of Scopus and PubMed databases. Studies reporting survival and clinical cure rates in patients treated with C/T, C/A, or M/V for bacteremia were included. Data extraction followed predefined criteria, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the findings. Results: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, with 18 reporting survival outcomes and 10 evaluating clinical cure rates. The pooled survival and clinical cure rates were 73.6% (95% CI: 67.5–79.8%, p < 0.001) and 76.2% (95% CI: 69.2–83.3%, p < 0.001), respectively, both exhibiting moderate heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses revealed consistent survival trends across study quality, with low- and high-risk-of-bias studies demonstrating comparable estimates. Given that C/A was the most frequently studied agent, its dedicated subgroup analysis yielded a pooled survival estimate of 73.4% (95% CI: 66.4–80.3%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides supporting evidence for the clinical effectiveness of C/T, C/A, and M/V in bacteremia reinforcing the role of BL/BLIs in antimicrobial stewardship as viable options for resistant infections. However, further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are warranted to validate these results and refine treatment strategies for bacteremia.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Shahd Mohammad, Mosab Albalas, Mohammad M. Al-Ahmad
Quelle
Antibiotics
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2079-6382
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Shahd Mohammad, Mosab Albalas, Mohammad M. Al-Ahmad (2026). Assessing Clinical Effectiveness of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam in Bacteremia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antibiotics. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15090843
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1