An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Hearing Aid Satisfaction: Integrating the HATASS Instrument and Clinical Insights

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Hearing aid technology adaptation and user satisfaction are influenced by multiple interacting demographic, clinical, and behavioral factors, making reliable prediction of outcomes challenging with conventional statistical approaches alone. This study proposes an explainable machine learning framework to investigate the multidimensional determinants of hearing aid satisfaction by integrating demographic characteristics, hearing aid-related variables, and patient-reported outcomes obtained from the Hearing Aid Technology Adaptation and Satisfaction Scale (HATASS). Five regression algorithms—Linear Regression, Decision Tree Regression (DTR), Random Forest Regression (RFR), Support Vector Regression, and Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR)—were comparatively evaluated using a five-fold cross-validation strategy. Predictive performance was assessed using the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and the coefficient of determination (R2), while model interpretability was investigated through cross-validated out-of-bag permutation feature importance analysis. Among the evaluated algorithms, Random Forest Regression achieved the most consistent predictive performance, yielding the lowest average RMSE (14.225) and the highest average R2 (0.146) under the adopted validation framework. Although the overall predictive performance remained modest, the explainability analysis consistently identified age as the most influential predictor, followed by onset year, education level, hearing aid usage duration, and daily hearing aid use. In contrast, gender, battery type, tinnitus, and vertigo contributed comparatively less to model predictions. These findings indicate that hearing aid adaptation and satisfaction arise from complex nonlinear interactions among demographic, behavioral, clinical, and device-related characteristics rather than isolated linear associations. The proposed framework provides an interpretable, internally validated analytical approach for investigating hearing aid technology adaptation and satisfaction and establishes a foundation for future studies that integrate comprehensive audiological measurements, longitudinal follow-up data, and independent external validation to support the development of more transparent and personalized hearing healthcare systems.