Frag' FlorenceEvidenz. Klar. Anwendbar.
Uhr 7/8Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Clinical Implications of Incorporating Molecular Profiles into the Staging of Endometrial Cancer: A Critical Review of the 2023 FIGO System on the Wave of 2025 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines

Angela Santoro, Giuseppe Angelico, Antonio d’Amati, Livia Maccio, Emma Bragantini, Francesco Fanfani, Anna Fagotti, Gian Franco Zannoni

Cancers · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

This review examines the clinical and practical implications of embedding molecular profiles directly into the 2023 FIGO staging system for endometrial carcinoma, in the context of the 2025 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines. The primary purpose is to navigate a central conflict in modern oncology: how to deliver increasingly personalized care while maintaining a globally accessible, equitable, and standardized cancer classification system. The 2023 FIGO update represents a paradigm shift from the traditional dualistic model (Type I versus Type II) by allowing molecular findings to redefine stage itself. While this integration offers clear benefits, it introduces significant challenges. First, the system depends on advanced molecular testing, creating a “rich-poor” divide where patients in resource-limited settings are systematically overtreated because testing is unavailable. Second, stage becomes unstable, changing with sequential histologic and molecular re-review, which causes confusion for patients and clinicians. Third, the system lumps prognostically distinct histotypes (Serous, Clear Cell, Carcinosarcoma, and Grade 3 Endometrioid) into a single aggressive stage, obscuring meaningful differences in survival. Fourth, it relies on subjective parameters such as “substantial” lymphovascular space invasion, for which no standardized definition exists, leading to high inter-observer variability. After analyzing these controversies, the review proposes a pragmatic solution: decouple anatomical staging from molecular risk stratification. Staging should remain a purely anatomical, universally applicable descriptor of tumor extent, while molecular and histologic data are used separately within a dynamic risk assessment model, as suggested by the European guidelines. This dual-track approach preserves global comparability, reduces inequity, and maintains diagnostic stability, while still enabling personalized treatment where advanced diagnostics are available.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Angela Santoro, Giuseppe Angelico, Antonio d’Amati, Livia Maccio, Emma Bragantini, Francesco Fanfani, Anna Fagotti, Gian Franco Zannoni
Quelle
Cancers
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2072-6694
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Angela Santoro, Giuseppe Angelico, Antonio d’Amati, Livia Maccio, Emma Bragantini, Francesco Fanfani, Anna Fagotti, Gian Franco Zannoni (2026). Clinical Implications of Incorporating Molecular Profiles into the Staging of Endometrial Cancer: A Critical Review of the 2023 FIGO System on the Wave of 2025 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines. Cancers. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18172748
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1