Frag' FlorenceEvidenz. Klar. Anwendbar.
Uhr 7/8Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Expert Consensus Develops Multidisciplinary Pathway for Cancer Pain Management in Italy: A Delphi Study

Francesco Cellini, Leonardo Consoletti, Massimo Di Maio, Diego Maria Michele Fornasari, Gianpaolo Fortini, Marta Gentili, Marco Krengli, Ernesto Maranzano, Silvia Natoli

Current Oncology · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Background: Cancer pain remains highly prevalent and undertreated despite established guidelines. In Italy, Law 38/2010 mandates systematic pain assessment, yet only 26% of clinicians routinely evaluate pain at each clinical visit, and fewer than one-quarter have received formal training in pain medicine or palliative care. A national multidisciplinary roundtable, convened in Rome in March 2025, formally identified four systemic gaps—insufficient education, fragmented care pathways, unclear professional roles, and challenges in implementing shared diagnostic and therapeutic pathways—and planned the development of a structured Delphi consensus. Methods: A Delphi consensus process was undertaken in accordance with CREDES guidelines. The Steering Committee, comprising representatives of six Italian scientific societies (AIRO, AIOM, AISD, Federdolore-SICD, SICP, ACD-SIAARTI) and a patient advocacy group (Fondazione Nora e Alberto Gentili), developed 15 clinical statements addressing pain assessment, management, referral criteria, monitoring, and documentation over five online meetings held between March and September 2025. Sixty-six Italian clinicians from various specialties were invited to participate; the survey was open from 1 October to 31 December 2025, with reminders every 10 days. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement (scoring 4 or 5 on a 5-point Likert scale). Results: Fifty-six clinicians completed the survey (response rate: 84.8%), representing medical oncology, radiation oncology, pain therapy, and palliative care specialties; individual statements were rated by 53–54 panelists, as skipping single items was permitted. All statements reached consensus in the first round (77.8–100%), precluding the need for a second voting round. Panelists’ qualitative comments informed minor wording refinements; substantial content was unchanged. Conclusions: The Delphi process produced a validated, multidisciplinary clinical pathway for cancer pain management in the Italian National Health System (NHS). The pathway establishes structured roles for the clinical reference physician and specialist consultants, objective decision thresholds for analgesic titration and referral, and minimum requirements for standardized pain documentation. These consensus-based statements provide actionable clinical guidance that may help address analgesic undertreatment and support the implementation of Law 38/2010 across Italian oncology centers.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Francesco Cellini, Leonardo Consoletti, Massimo Di Maio, Diego Maria Michele Fornasari, Gianpaolo Fortini, Marta Gentili, Marco Krengli, Ernesto Maranzano, Silvia Natoli
Quelle
Current Oncology
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
1718-7729
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Francesco Cellini, Leonardo Consoletti, Massimo Di Maio, Diego Maria Michele Fornasari, Gianpaolo Fortini, Marta Gentili, Marco Krengli, Ernesto Maranzano, Silvia Natoli (2026). Expert Consensus Develops Multidisciplinary Pathway for Cancer Pain Management in Italy: A Delphi Study. Current Oncology. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33090507
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1