Frag' FlorenceEvidenz. Klar. Anwendbar.
Uhr 7/8Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

10.3390/polym8030084

CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · 2000

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Sarcopenia is highly prevalent in patients with end-stage renal disease and is associated with adverse outcomes. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of rectus femoris ultrasound, compared with bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), for identifying sarcopenia defined by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2) in haemodialysis patients, and derived overall and sex-specific ultrasound cut-off values. <b>Methods</b>: In this single-centre cross-sectional study, haemodialysis patients were assessed for sarcopenia according to EWGSOP2 criteria. Rectus femoris thickness (RFT) and cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured by ultrasound, while BIS was used to estimate body composition. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, and areas under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals were estimated to assess the ability of ultrasound and BIS-derived parameters to discriminate confirmed sarcopenia. Optimal overall and sex-specific cut-off values were determined using the Youden index. <b>Results</b>: A total of 115 patients were included. Median age was 73.0 years [IQR: 63.0-82.0], 67.0% were men. Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 50 patients (43.5%; 95%CI: 34.3-53.0). RFT and CSA showed moderate diagnostic accuracy for confirmed sarcopenia, with AUCs of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.63-0.82) and 0.72 (95%CI: 0.63-0.81), respectively. Ultrasound cut-offs of 11.9 mm for RFT and 4.4 cm 2 for CSA yielded high sensitivity and moderate specificity. <b>Conclusions</b>: Rectus femoris ultrasound represents a feasible bedside approach for identifying EWGSOP2-defined sarcopenia in haemodialysis patients. Its diagnostic performance was comparable to that of BIS-derived measures, supporting its potential use in routine clinical practice. Further studies are warranted to validate the proposed cut-off values.

Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nicht angegeben
Quelle
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
Publikation
2000-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0849-6757
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

(2000). 10.3390/polym8030084. CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16162490
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON