Frag' FlorenceEvidenz. Klar. Anwendbar.
Uhr 7/8Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Digital Patient-Reported Monitoring of Functional Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With or Without Perioperative Hormonal Therapy

Bogdan Adrian Buhas, Alessandro Uleri, Giorgio Calleris, Guilhem Roubaud, Marine Lesourd, Benjamin Pradère, Christophe Tollon, Damien Pouessel, Bernard Malavaud, Loïc Mourey, Guillaume Ploussard

Diagnostics · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Background/Objectives: Perioperative androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) are increasingly used in high-risk prostate cancer, yet patient-centred functional-recovery data after radical prostatectomy are scarce and rarely standardized. We assessed whether a smartphone-based digital monitoring pathway could characterize social-continence recovery and capture differences associated with a perioperative hormonal therapy (PHT) strategy after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph-node dissection (RARP + LND). Methods: In a two-centre consecutive cohort (n = 98) of men with high-risk, non-metastatic prostate cancer aligned with SUGAR and PROTEUS criteria, we compared upfront surgery (standard of care [SOC], n = 72) with a planned PHT strategy (ADT or ARPI, n = 26); all patients were urinary-continent preoperatively. Clinical data were prospective; patient-reported and patient-experience measures were captured through a routine-care digital platform (Betty Coaching application) delivering an identical prehabilitation/rehabilitation pathway to both groups, with pre- and postoperative pelvic-floor muscle training performed by all patients. The primary endpoint was 6-month social continence (0–1 pad/day), assessed by clinician and patient reports as co-primary sources. Differences are reported as risk differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: At 6 weeks, no statistically clear difference was observed (clinician 66.2% vs. 56.5%; risk difference 9.7 percentage points, 95% CI −12 to 32). At 6 months, social continence was lower with PHT (clinician 87.1% vs. 65.0%, difference 22.1 points, 95% CI 2.6 to 44.7; patient 81.3% vs. 58.3%, 22.9 points, 95% CI 2.4 to 43.9), converging by 12 months (96.9% vs. 95.0%). Analgesic-free rates were lower with PHT on postoperative days (POD) 7 and 10. Conclusions: Digital monitoring captured granular recovery trajectories and identified a mid-term social-continence signal associated with PHT, compatible with a transient delay in recovery. These hypothesis-generating findings support embedding standardized digital functional-outcome monitoring in perioperative trials.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Bogdan Adrian Buhas, Alessandro Uleri, Giorgio Calleris, Guilhem Roubaud, Marine Lesourd, Benjamin Pradère, Christophe Tollon, Damien Pouessel, Bernard Malavaud, Loïc Mourey, Guillaume Ploussard
Quelle
Diagnostics
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2075-4418
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Bogdan Adrian Buhas, Alessandro Uleri, Giorgio Calleris, Guilhem Roubaud, Marine Lesourd, Benjamin Pradère, Christophe Tollon, Damien Pouessel, Bernard Malavaud, Loïc Mourey, Guillaume Ploussard (2026). Digital Patient-Reported Monitoring of Functional Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With or Without Perioperative Hormonal Therapy. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16172748
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1