AI-Enabled Digital Phenotyping for Personalized Risk Stratification in Internet Gaming Disorder: A Privacy-Preserving Simulation Study

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Background/Objectives: Assessment of Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) relies on retrospective self-reports and clinical interviews, which may be affected by recall and social desirability biases and may be insensitive to behavioral change. This study evaluated an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled, privacy-preserving digital phenotyping framework for personalized IGD risk stratification under controlled simulation assumptions. Methods: A synthetic dataset of 1000 virtual user profiles was generated with a 20% elevated-risk prevalence and 5% balanced stochastic label noise. Four aggregated telemetry features were modeled: average session duration, sessions per week, Late-Night Index, and application-switching rate. Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and Gradient Boosting classifiers were evaluated using a stratified 80:20 hold-out split, five-fold cross-validation, playtime-only baselines, label-noise sensitivity analysis, and 200 synthetic realizations. Results: The primary Random Forest model achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.850, a sensitivity of 0.800, a specificity of 0.900, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.909, an average precision (AP) of 0.779, and a Brier score of 0.089. As an internal consistency check under the pre-specified synthetic signal structure, all-feature models showed higher performance than playtime-only baselines, and feature importance analyses recovered the encoded signal hierarchy. Performance declined with increasing label noise. Across 200 realizations, mean ROC-AUC values for the three all-feature models ranged from 0.888 to 0.904, with overlapping empirical 95% intervals. Conclusions: The framework demonstrates the methodological feasibility of transforming aggregated telemetry into interpretable risk signals while avoiding content-level monitoring. These findings are hypothesis-generating and do not establish clinical validity or diagnostic performance. Longitudinal validation in clinically characterized cohorts is required before deployment.