Frag' FlorenceEvidenz. Klar. Anwendbar.
Uhr 7/8Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Between Private Vengeance and Public Justice: Hamlet’s Fragmented Magnanimity

Luke Foster

Literature · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Fortinbras’ words at the curtain suggest that if the time had been less out of joint and the state less rotten, Hamlet might have grown into commanding authority. Defining what is potentially regal about Hamlet helps characterize Shakespeare’s vision of politics. This article argues that according to the tradition of Ciceronian and Christian natural law the play invokes, Hamlet has a duty to exact retribution on Claudius. Although Hamlet’s initial suicidal impulse gives way to a desire to pursue political honor, he fails to enact public justice on Claudius. The final scene’s parodic trial-by-arms reveals that Hamlet’s magnanimous desire to rule becomes a danger to Denmark because that desire is not ruled by the common good.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Luke Foster
Quelle
Literature
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2410-9789
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Luke Foster (2026). Between Private Vengeance and Public Justice: Hamlet’s Fragmented Magnanimity. Literature. https://doi.org/10.3390/literature6030022
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1