Reliability Assessment of Second-Life EV Batteries Using Probabilistic Deep Learning Models for State-of-Health Prediction

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Accurate State-of-Health (SOH) prediction is essential for deploying retired electric vehicle batteries into reliable second-life energy storage systems. However, this task is challenged by sparse and noisy operational data from onboard Battery Management Systems (BMS). This study systematically evaluates a spectrum of deep learning architectures for SOH forecasting under BMS-style data constraints derived from laboratory cycling data: a BiLSTM on aggregated cycle statistics (Model A), preliminary zero-shot transfer to a single unseen cell (Model B), a waveform BiLSTM with full intra-cycle voltage, current, and temperature trajectories (Model C), a baseline TCN (Model D) and a probabilistic TCN-GPR hybrid (Model E). All models are constrained to identical low-fidelity BMS-style variables extracted from the NASA battery aging dataset. Model C achieves the lowest point accuracy error of 0.46% ± 0.18% MAE across five random seeds, demonstrating that high-resolution waveform inputs capture degradation signatures, notably voltage plateau morphology, transient dynamics, and implicit SOC information, that aggregated features irreversibly lose. Model D using the same waveform inputs and evaluation protocol as Model C, achieves a MAE of 2.99% at a single seed, providing direct architectural comparison evidence that the BiLSTM’s position-sensitive temporal summarization outperforms GlobalAveragePooling1D under these conditions. Model E achieves a higher MAE of 2.12% ± 0.33% but uniquely provides calibrated predictive distributions of 99.4% ± 1.2% coverage, NLL = −1.877 ± 0.038, with approximately uniform 95% predictive intervals (mean width 19.83% SOH across 34 test cycles at seed = 42), reflecting the near-constant posterior variance produced by the large optimized GPR length-scale under the frozen two-stage training design. A paired t-test confirms that Model C statistically significantly outperforms Model E on point accuracy (p < 0.01). Isotonic regression recalibration reduces mean calibration error from 0.138 to 0.010, demonstrating that shape-level miscalibration is correctable post hoc. The central implication for second-life battery deployment is a clear accuracy–uncertainty trade-off: Model C is preferred when point estimates suffice, while Model E is essential for risk-aware decisions requiring confidence intervals.