10.3928/00485713-20080401-06

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

<h4>Background</h4>Racially and ethnically minoritized (REM) nursing faculty remain underrepresented, while theory-aligned measurement of marginalization in faculty samples is limited.<h4>Method</h4>In a cross-sectional survey of faculty from CCNE-accredited programs (<i>N</i> = 715), participants completed demographics and the 19-item Englund Marginality Index (EMI). Welch-corrected <i>t</i> tests and ANCOVA with bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrapping (5,000 resamples) examined racial differences and race × age/rank interactions, adjusting for age, rank, tenure, and gender.<h4>Results</h4>REM faculty reported higher EMI total scores than White faculty. Largest disparities were in intermediacy and differentiation, with smaller but significant gaps in secrecy, voice, liminality, and reflectiveness; power was non-significant. Adjusted models confirmed group differences and significant race × age and race × rank interactions. The total model explained approximately 58% of variance.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Findings localize marginalization to bridgework and hierarchy. Institutions should implement formal sponsorship, inclusive governance, and equity-aligned evaluation, with targeted support for early-career faculty.

Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz