Frag' FlorenceEvidenz. Klar. Anwendbar.
Uhr 7/8Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Crossref · journal-article

Effect of Different Adhesive Systems on Shear Bond Strength Between Resin Cement and Titanium Abutment Surfaces

İrem Sözen Yanık, Dilara Sahin Hazir, Barış Güncü

Clinical Dentistry and Research · 2026 · Band 50 · Ausgabe 2 · S. 111-118

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Background and Aim: This study evaluated the shearbond strength (SBS) of a universal resin cement to pre-milledtitanium surfaces using three different adhesive approaches.Materials and Methods: Forty-eight titanium specimens wereobtained from pre-milled titanium abutment blanks and equallydistributed into three experimental groups (n = 16) according tothe adhesive strategy: a dedicated metal primer (G-Multi Primer), atwo-bottle universal adhesive (Tokuyama Universal Bond II), and aone-bottle universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Plus). Prior tobonding, all surfaces were conditioned by airborne-particle abrasionusing 50 μm aluminum oxide particles. Resin cement cylinders wereprepared using a custom stainless-steel jig to ensure standardizeddimensions and positioning. The same self-adhesive dual-cure resincement (Maxcem Elite) was used for all specimens. Following 24hours of water storage at 37°C, immediate SBS was measured usinga universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min.Fracture patterns after debonding were categorized as adhesive,cohesive, or mixed failures. Statistical evaluation included one-wayANOVA and Fisher’s Exact test at a significance level of 0.05.Results: Baseline surface roughness did not differ significantlyamong the experimental groups (p > 0.05). Airborne-particleabrasion increased the mean Ra value from 0.22 μm to 0.54 μm,with no significant differences among the groups after surfacetreatment (p > 0.05). Tokuyama Universal Bond II demonstratedthe highest mean SBS value (18.53 ± 2.45 MPa), followed byG-Multi Primer (17.32 ± 1.99 MPa) and Scotchbond UniversalPlus (16.67 ± 1.97 MPa). There were no significant differencesamong the adhesive systems (p = 0.057). Adhesive-type failurerepresented the most frequent fracture pattern across all groups,accounting for 62.5%–75% of failures. Cohesive fractures wereidentified only in the Tokuyama and G-Multi Primer groups.Conclusions: Both universal adhesives and dedicatedmetal primers demonstrated comparable immediate bondingperformance to titanium surfaces.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
İrem Sözen Yanık, Dilara Sahin Hazir, Barış Güncü
Quelle
Clinical Dentistry and Research
Publikation
2026-08-24
Band / Ausgabe
50 / 2
Seiten
111-118
ISSN / ISBN
2146-3972
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
30 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

İrem Sözen Yanık, Dilara Sahin Hazir, Barış Güncü (2026). Effect of Different Adhesive Systems on Shear Bond Strength Between Resin Cement and Titanium Abutment Surfaces. Clinical Dentistry and Research, 50 (2), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.65022/clindentres.1954033
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON